Back

ASPIRING Novice FOUNDER
Novice FOUNDER
I don’t typically post on socials, I’m more of a lurker, but I saw a post recently that gave me a bit of inspiration to actually put my own thoughts down.

When I first became interested in trading and investing, it wasn’t really from a deep academic angle. It was more of a simple idea build enough capital and skill in markets to give myself freedom to explore other things in life. Finance, investing, and markets were just the vehicle to get there.

My background is in Building Services Engineering, working within the mechanical side of the industry (ventilation, heating, domestic services, and associated systems). That’s been my core professional focus, but over the past few years I’ve found myself increasingly drawn into finance and markets in general. Not just as a side interest, but something I actively want to understand at a deeper level.

Like a lot of people, my introduction to trading came through ICT-style concepts and the broader “retail trading education” space. At the time it felt structured and logical, like there was a hidden framework to the markets that just needed to be learned and applied.

After spending time with it, I started to become increasingly dissatisfied. The more I tested and observed, the more it felt like the edge being presented wasn’t as consistent or transferable as it was made out to be. That led to a bit of a reset in how I thought about trading altogether.

Instead of continuing down that same path, I started digging into how markets actually operate at a more institutional level and how professional firms approach risk, execution, and strategy design. That naturally led me into quantitative finance and systematic approaches to trading. It felt less like pattern-chasing and more like something grounded in data, structure, and repeatability.

That shift has changed how I view trading entirely. It’s no longer about shortcuts or quick outcomes. It’s more about building a genuine skillset over time in understanding probability, risk, and systems properly.

On a broader level, I still don’t have everything figured out long term. For now, I’m just continuing to explore different technical areas, keep learning, and pay attention to what I naturally keep coming back to.
May 18, 2026 · 01:55 PM · 25 views · Commons
2 Reposts
6 Likes
5 Replies
(Edited)
@quantguild
Roman Paolucci Mod Trader FOUNDER
@quantguild · May 18, 2026 · 02:28 PM
Trader FOUNDER
So glad you decided to write this, it will no doubt help many who see it - great post.
Reply
@pretoninho
Pretoninus II Mod Trader FOUNDER
@pretoninho Solaris Traders · May 18, 2026 · 02:53 PM
Trader FOUNDER
Welcome to Discourses!

I also studied the concept of ICT.

I can't wait to see your analyses on the market and your feelings!

If you are looking for a guild, I invite you to join us in SOLARIS ☀️
Translated from French
Reply
Jordan FOUNDER
@jordan Options Monastery · May 18, 2026 · 03:46 PM
FOUNDER
My journey is very much similar to yours. Got into it because I want financial freedom to explore other areas of life, and of course first started with technical analysis and day trading. I've since learned that all of that is basically a scam, and gotten into quantitative finance instead. Thankfully I enjoy math a lot. Keep learning!
Reply
@tsiakos69 · May 18, 2026 · 07:10 PM
Extremely similar story here! But I took it a step too far, I quit my HVAC building services job to pursue a career in quantitative finance! Signed up to a Master's degree which I am about to graduate this summer, and even though the job market is terrible we have to stay positive that it will work out!

Keep learning, testing, messing around and enjoy the journey!
Reply
traderdavebtc Novice FOUNDER
@traderdavebtc · May 19, 2026 · 07:25 PM
Novice FOUNDER
Congrats on breaking away from ICT. That's a literal cult. I'd like to add one thing. The term "risk management" is often tossed around with no real weight behind it. What it really means is that you are aware of the potential risks that can kill a trade, but you also must be skilled in understanding those risks enough to avoid making a mistake that you don't fully comprehend. If a trade goes sideways, you should know from at least any formal training you may have, what went wrong, to some degree. For me, it was a giant freaking offer placed on the Binance limit order book last week. Things under the hood looked great. The options and futures market was positioned in such a way that if Bitcoin kept moving just a little higher, it would have forced a lot of people to start covering and generate a ton of demand. That was interrupted by an insanely over the average offer that was placed over Bitcoin that was not likely to get filled and create a supply run, where many people begin to sell. Bitcoin was ripe for a little trend last week, until someone spoofed the book. That kind of knowledge and understanding comes from formal training with real professionals and 6 years staring at limit order book activity. Take it with a grain of salt. Can't manage the risks if you don't know what they are.
Reply